Closer Node to you = Better stability, less focus on speed. Usually I let it auto-select a node/path.įrom what I understand (which is pretty damned limited).
I tried to have them add Uthgard in and it turned out that the only DAoC server it was set up to work with was already Uthgard.įull VPN works too, but that will use more data/put all your other traffic through it. Nope, the DAoC "item" that is in it actually is for Uthgard.
What is better wtfast or pingzapper full#
Grunklestank wrote:Do you use it in Full VPN mode? If so, do you select a node close to you? Or do you think it'd be better to select a node geographically close to the server? Can't remember exactly, but I wanna say its "Telia" or something domain (oddly, it's before it gets to ).Īnyone have any experience with a good VPN for playing on Uth? I'm willing to pay more for one that I know is high quality, particularly the connection to the German location of Uth. When I do a tracert to the server, the problem (as witnessed by packet loss) appears to begin about 2-3 hops after my connection crosses the Atlantic.
I have no idea what's going on, as nothing has changed on my end or on the server's end. Sometimes my connection is perfect, and then sometimes - for an hour or 2 - I have something that resembles a 14.4 kbps dial-up connection to Uth. Now, I get hit with random waves of extremely high latency and packet loss, which results in chain LD's. I have literally never had any problems with it at all - until about 2 weeks ago. My connection to Uth 2.0 has always been 100% stable and fast, even though I live in the US.
0 kommentar(er)
